Last week, I wrote about the controversy surrounding the posting of the entire short film, The Incredibly Slow Murderer with the Terribly Inefficient Weapon, on YouTube. As soon as I saw that the video had been pulled, I contacted the short film's director, Richard Gale, to get the inside scoop. Gale wrote me back immediately and explained things from his perspective:I was reading Andrew Sullivan's blog like I do most mornings, like reading the morning paper, and all of a sudden I see my film, The Horribly Slow Murderer with the Extremely Inefficient Weapon, on his blog! The blood rushed to my face-- I knew someone had put it on You Tube. The person who did it was a guy in Hungary who somehow (I don't know how) got a copy and uploaded it. He didn't mean any harm-- he gave me credit on his page and posted a link to my site. And it got crazy amounts of views-- about 50,000 views within 48 hours, and was ranked as the #18 Top Rated Film on You Tube when he took it down at my request-- It was a really tough thing for me to do when it was going viral like that. So why take it down now?
The problem is-- it's been booked to exclusively play in several film festivals for the next few months.Also, I'd like to see if I can sell the short to Comedy Central, or Sundance Channel, or IFC... and having it on You Tube eliminates those options. Plus, when a video is going viral -- as the filmmaker you want to be in control of the YouTube page to help guide interested traffic to your other works. I plan on releasing the film in a few months on You Tube, and later this Fall on DVD with a bunch of extras (including a full 90-minute "excerpt" from the 9-hour feature film).
In the meantime, this was a wild couple of days for myself and my friends who worked on the film -- it's served as a "marketing test" that lets us know this film is in demand by a lot of people, and that's a great thing.
Support your indie horror filmmakers.

0 comments:
Post a Comment